Supreme Court – Abortion is repeated in the United States

What has happened now is that American women’s rights organizations and liberals have long warned. The U.S. Supreme Court, which has a conservative majority of six to three judges since the last legislature, has been handling cases related to abortion regulations.

In particular, the judges said Monday they were dealing with a Mississippi state law that allows abortions for up to 15 weeks.

It is subject to a national ban on abortion law. The 1973 Row and Wade model is often cited. With this ruling, the Supreme Court declared that termination of pregnancy is covered by the right to privacy and that women are completely free to have an abortion in the first trimester (12 or 13 weeks). During the second trimester (up to week 27), the government may restrict or restrict it for health reasons, and may prohibit termination only from the third trimester – the 28th week of pregnancy.

With that Roe V. Wade is sometimes more generous than the abortion law in force in Austria since 1975. In this country, dismissal is only possible within the first 16 weeks (deadline settlement), after which there are good medical reasons. Mississippi is as it is up to now.

Rowe V. Planned Parenthood in the United States in 1992. Casey. This limited the possible period of termination without clinical signs. The right to privacy and the protection of the fetus are always weighed against each other. The Supreme Court believes that fetal rights are stronger than possible outside the womb.

Rowe V. Wade, the court considered that people can live freely from the third trimester. However, due to medical advances, the date was moved forward in 1992.

Performance is considered from the 24th week

Most experts believe that this reliability can occur from the 24th week of pregnancy – if medical care is provided to such premature babies. A regular pregnancy lasts 40 weeks.

With a review of the law in Mississippi, national law in the United States could be drastically reduced.

However, it remains to be seen whether it will really come to that. Just because conservative judges are in the majority does not automatically mean Roy V. The calf is tilted. In early 1992, under Republican President George W. Bush, conservative judges were in the majority. At the time, however, to the surprise of many, they spoke out in favor of maintaining Roy V. Wade Out – Although they allow states to introduce barriers to abortion, it is still used as an option.

Source: Just because abortion is legal does not mean that the government in the United States (or Austria) should have easy access to it. Whether doctors or clinics perform medically unspecified abortions depends on conscience and finances – ultimately indicating that entire districts are without relevant benefits. In Mississippi, which has a population of three million, there is currently only one hospital that performs such procedures. Leaving the federal capital in Austria is becoming increasingly difficult.

In Austria abortion is still regulated by penal law – it is not legal, but only referred to as “exemption from punishment” within the term settlement – which is paradoxically determined by many experts in this matter.

In the United States, abortion refunds are handled differently by state. In Austria, abortion usually has to be paid for in full – unlike many Western European countries, the costs are partially or fully offset.

Incidentally, the Liberal Front runner-up is Canada. There have been no legal restrictions on abortion in North America since 1982, and the costs are borne by the government.